The science of real friendship

Most people don’t struggle to meet new faces. They struggle to turn one good meeting into a real bond. The Week Club is built around what research repeatedly points to: repeated time, predictable proximity, and low-pressure settings.

No auto-renew Refund if not placed Guidelines & standards
The problem with most adult social life

Modern socialising optimises for novelty. New faces, new venues, new conversations. Novelty is energising — but it’s a weak mechanism for building closeness. Friendship is usually the slow accumulation of shared context.

The Week Club thesis

  • Friendship is a repeat-exposure problem more than a personality problem.
  • Most people don’t need more events. They need a reliable rhythm with the same people.
  • Simple, local meetups remove friction so repetition becomes realistic.

Ready to stop “starting from zero”?
Protect one weekly slot. We’ll match the rest.

Prefer to wait? Register interest.

Practical takeaway: if your social life is built on one-off contact, it will repeatedly reset. The Week Club is designed so it doesn’t.
The research (skimmable)

If you like receipts, here they are. If not, you can skip to how it works.

1) Time together predicts closeness

Closeness tends to require a meaningful amount of shared time — with the same people. One-off events often feel good but don’t create enough repeated interaction to cross the threshold from acquaintance to friend.

“It takes about 50 hours to move from acquaintance to casual friend.”
Source: University of Kansas summary of Hall’s research (2018): KU Today
“About 200 hours is needed for best friends.”
Same source link above.
How The Week Club uses this: weekly meetups compress the timeline. You stop relying on luck, flukes, and vague plans.

Design implication

  • Consistency is the real product. The activity is the wrapper.
  • A short, defined cycle makes commitment easier than an open-ended promise.
  • Small groups increase repeated interaction density.
2) Familiarity increases comfort and liking

Repeated exposure reduces uncertainty and makes interaction feel easier. Early-stage awkwardness is often a stage — not a signal that the people are wrong.

“Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.”
Source: Zajonc (1968) record: Semantic Scholar  | Related review PDF: Stang (1975)
How this maps to The Week Club: week 1 doesn’t need to be perfect. The structure exists so week 2 and week 3 can do their job.

A useful reframe

  • Awkwardness is often a stage, not a signal.
  • Comfort is a byproduct of repetition.
  • Small, consistent groups reduce the pressure to perform.
3) Proximity protects momentum

Logistics quietly kill adult friendship. When it’s easy to see someone again, connection grows. When it’s hard, it fades — even when there’s genuine mutual liking.

“A study of human factors in housing.”
Source: Festinger, Schachter & Back (propinquity / housing): Summary / record
How this maps to The Week Club: local groups plus low-effort meetups make repeat contact the default, not a heroic act of planning.

Design implication

  • Proximity reduces drop-off.
  • Simple meetups reduce cancellation risk.
  • Predictable weekly slots reduce decision fatigue.
4) The context: loneliness is measurable

Loneliness is common — especially in big cities where you can be surrounded by options while lacking consistent bonds. Public data tracks loneliness and wellbeing indicators over time, which helps explain why a structured approach resonates.

UK Office for National Statistics (loneliness topic hub): ONS Loneliness datasets
What this means: the problem is common, but most solutions are unstructured. Consistency is the missing ingredient.

Want the practical version?
Here’s exactly how a cycle works.